Talk:2007 Icelandic parliamentary election

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

Iceland Low‑importance

	Iceland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Iceland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Iceland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IcelandWikipedia:WikiProject IcelandTemplate:WikiProject IcelandIceland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

the Alliance

the Alliance is not against the war in Afghanistan, take it away

Icelandic PR

Can someone explain how proportional representation works in Iceland? In the North Reykjavik constituency, the Independence Party won four seats with 36.4% of the vote, while the Alliance Party won three seats with 29.2%. But then the Alliance is allocated two additional seats ("Uppbótar") which gives them five, a gain of one, despite a lower vote and a decline of 7% since the last election. Why is this done? Intelligent Mr Toad 07:56, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's because the d'Hondt rule used for allocating seats to parties sometimes leads to parties not having the amount of seats their percentage of the total vote (in all constituencies) should warrant them. At this point they get allocated one of a fixed number of extra seats (the uppbotar-) available for each constituency. This is to guarantee that a partie's number of seats is always correct with regard to their proportion of the votes in total. It can actually be really complicated to anticipate where (i.e. in which constituency) the extra seat that the party should get falls. I think it is where the party is closest to getting the next man inside at that point. In this case the Alliance won both of the extra seats allocated for Reykjavik north, whereas in others it got none. Regards... --Akigka —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.220.104.152 (talk) 14:23, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]